Designer Accademia di Belle Arti di Urbino Titillium is born inside the Accademia di Belle Arti di Urbino as a didactic project Course Type design of the Master of Visual Design Campi Visivi. The aim of the project is the creation of a collective fonts released under OFL. Each academic year, a dozen students work on the project, developing it further and solving problems. Any type designer interested in the amendment or revision of Titillium is invited to co-operate with us, or develop their own variants of the typeface according to the terms specified in the Open Font license. We also ask all graphic designers who use Titillium in their projects to email us some examples of the typeface family in use, in order to prepare a case histories database. Three years after the birth of Titillium, the project is still evolving, and even we don’t know what it will become in the future.

rL

7gGF

&G

641@8546

3R1684

75*9@

RpBm

^j(E)B

!oWN%

*VxX$

The attorney general for the District of Columbia may have obtained internal company emails showing that Facebook had knowledge of Cambridge Analytica’s data-harvesting efforts months sooner than

CEO

Mark Zuckerberg

let on last year. But the company is now in court arguing to keep the emails under seal, saying the firm’s data-scraping is unrelated to that other breach of privacy for which it faced criticism for more than a year.

In a court filing this week, attorneys for the District said they were possession of emails that showed Facebook employees based in Washington, D.C., “played a leading role in responding to how third-party applications improperly sold consumer data to Cambridge Analytica (and other parties) in violation of Facebook’s policies.”

The filing, which is partially redacted, also says emails show a Facebook employee “warned the company” about Cambridge Analytica’s “data-scraping practices” in September 2015, roughly three months before the Guardian reported that the firm had acquired data on millions of Facebook users without their consent.

In a statement last year on Facebook, Zuckerberg claimed that his company first learned about Cambridge Analytica’s unauthorized collection of user data in December 2015, after the Guardian and broke the story.

Facebook is now claiming that the conversation about Cambridge Analytica in the emails is unrelated to the data it illicitly obtained from Aleksandr Kogan, a Cambridge University researcher who initially acquired it through a personality quiz he operated on the platform. (The quiz, installed by around 300,000 people, enabled Kogan to collect not only their data but data on roughly 50 million other Facebook users.)

“In September 2015 employees heard speculation that Cambridge Analytica was scraping data, something that is unfortunately common for any internet service,” a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement...

For usability and convenience, yes. At a surface level, AMP is going to be helpful to both users and businesses. However, there are concerns over whether this turns previously company-agnostic infrastructure—like email—into just another piece of Google’s platform, and some question AMP’s security.For usability and convenience, yes. At a surface level, AMP is going to be helpful to both users and businesses. However, there are concerns over whether this turns previously company-agnostic infrastructure—like email—into just another piece of Google’s platform, and some question AMP’s security.For usability and convenience, yes. At a surface level, AMP is going to be helpful to both users and businesses. However, there are concerns over whether this turns previously company-agnostic infrastructure—like email—into just another piece of Google’s platform, and some question AMP’s security.

While AMP emails would technically prevent users from accidentally clicking phishing links or downloading malicious attachments, some argue that having code running within an email message (not to mention ads and potential data-collection) is far riskier since ad blockers, pop-up blockers, and anti-virus software would usually be able to intercept sketchy links and files otherwise.While AMP emails would technically prevent users from accidentally clicking phishing links or downloading malicious attachments, some argue that having code running within an email message (not to mention ads and potential data-collection) is far riskier since ad blockers, pop-up blockers, and anti-virus software would usually be able to intercept sketchy links and files otherwise.While AMP emails would technically prevent users from accidentally clicking phishing links or downloading malicious attachments, some argue that having code running within an email message (not to mention ads and potential data-collection) is far riskier since ad blockers, pop-up blockers, and anti-virus software would usually be able to intercept sketchy links and files otherwise.

Even though these fears over privacy and Google’s spreading influence and control over the web are fair, they’re also mostly speculative at this point. Personally, I wouldn’t be too concerned about AMP; in fact, I think it’ll probably wind up being a convenient change that general users will welcome. Besides, no matter how AMP email integration plays out, there’s almost always another option than what Google or other big companies are pushing.Even though these fears over privacy and Google’s spreading influence and control over the web are fair, they’re also mostly speculative at this point. Personally, I wouldn’t be too concerned about AMP; in fact, I think it’ll probably wind up being a convenient change that general users will welcome. Besides, no matter how AMP email integration plays out, there’s almost always another option than what Google or other big companies are pushing.Even though these fears over privacy and Google’s spreading influence and control over the web are fair, they’re also mostly speculative at this point. Personally, I wouldn’t be too concerned about AMP; in fact, I think it’ll probably wind up being a convenient change that general users will welcome. Besides, no matter how AMP email integration plays out, there’s almost always another option than what Google or other big companies are pushing.Even though these fears over privacy and Google’s spreading influence and control over the web are fair, they’re also mostly speculative at this point. Personally, I wouldn’t be too concerned about AMP; in fact, I think it’ll probably wind up being a convenient change that general users will welcome. Besides, no matter how AMP email integration plays out, there’s almost always another option than what Google or other big companies are pushing.